I'm currently working on a fantasy world, as I said a few days ago. The world is coming together well enough. Figured out the relationship between geography and climate (though not orbit and climate, sadly, which I cannot seem to find useful information for easily calculating). My problem now stems from a problem of naming, which seems to be a trap between oddly French sounding upper royalty "houses" and oddly middle English sounding stuff for most of the lower "houses."
So I suppose the question is this:
Should I change the upper houses to reflect the linguistic heritage of the lower houses, or could there be a valid reason from a linguistic perspective for those names to stay with their French influence (accidental) if there are no French-like cultures surrounding them (and, thus, no invasions, cultural transference, and so on)?I'm leaning towards changing the names, even though I like them as they are (the upper houses are Echeler, Millard, and Dorian, with Lyemark as the only slightly Frankish/Middle English outlier).
(The lesser houses, unfinished though they may be, are currently named as follows: Leyne, Pyne, Trym, Cambryn, Caethyn, Prymsteyn, and Aestyn -- yes, I am fairly obsessed with the Y right now.)
Maybe the upper and lower houses grew out of two different family lines?
ReplyDeleteAll I try to do with naming conventions is make them internally consistent with the world, and across the whole story. Everything else is secondary.
ReplyDeleteI'm with Adam there. I try to make naming conventions fit within the world and the society.
ReplyDeleteAdam: Well, yeah, but that's sort of the problem here. Trying to figure out how to make this named system work within the world. I got a solution, though, so all is well.
ReplyDeleteSparkling: Yes, that's sort of where I was going, though more along the lines of cultural cross-pollination from the nearby culture, with the French-sounding upper houses the last holdouts of a dead culture. It fits with my feigned hate of the French :P