The World in the Satin Bag has moved to my new website.  If you want to see what I'm up to, head on over there!

Friday, April 04, 2008

Movie Review: The Last Mimzy

During my long eleven hour flight to England (and the thirteen hours back) I had the opportunity to watch several movies from last year and I decided I'd do reviews of all of those movies here, since they are sf/f flicks and might be of interest to some of you who haven't seen them yet and are wondering whether they are worth your time. One of those films was The Last Mimzy.
The Last Mimzy was a film I wanted to see in theaters last year, but missed. Now I'm glad I missed it. This is a poorly made film, which is sad considering the interesting story it is trying to tell, the relatively decent graphics, and the strong cast of adult actors. The story follows a pair of kids in Washington who find a mysterious alien box, inside of which is a stuffed bunny and some other nifty stuff. We're told from the start that this has something to do with saving the human race and the box is from the future (apparently the genetic structure of humans has become tainted and needs new genetic material to act as a cure). What could have been a really brilliant idea (based on a book) fell flat on its face for a variety of reasons.

Direction 2/5
Whether or not I'm basing this on poor acting or writing is irrelevant. There is a lot a director can do to make sure scenes come out right and not the way they arrived on screen. There were so many poorly built scenes that could have been fixed with a bit of direction, or heck, even re-shooting said scenes. Regardless, the directing falls desperately short, but certainly doesn't take the mantle as the biggest flaw in the film.

Cast 2/5
One big flaw in the cast are the two child actors (Chris O'neil and Rhiannon Leigh Wryn) chosen to play the roles of brother and sister (Noah and Emma). There is, and always will be, a certain amount of leeway we can give to children. After all, they aren't professional actors (Dakota Fanning is not a professional, she's a child actor), and often have very little experience when chosen for a role. The problem with this movie is that these children are clearly not ready for this level of acting. They come off stilted and obviously too fake. Some of this has to do with the writing, which gives them gee-golly wow lines from time to time that just sound stupid (they made me cringe). I personally have no problem with child actors, as they are often times rather good and add a childish flare to things (look at those Harry Potter kids), but these two, especially the oldest boy, are clearly not right for this sort of role.
Other issues are with the characters themselves. Beyond the children there is a homeland security agent (played by Michael Clarke Duncan), a somewhat nutty teacher (Rainn Wilson from The Office) and his mystic girlfriend (Kathryn Hahn). These characters would work well if they were written better. We don't see Duncan's character until nearly the end of the film, and we're supposed to actually care about him even though we only have a brief glimpse into his life. Moments later we see him using the Patriot Act to take into custody Noah, Emma, and their parents, whisking them away to a hospital or something along those lines for questioning (a note here is that a little bit before this Noah and Emma, while fiddling with the toys, accidentally shut off the power to all of Seattle).

Adaptaion N/A
I didn't read the short story this is based on, so I can't say anything here.

Writing 1/5
The writing serves to be probably the biggest flaw in the movie. First off, there is no child who magically teleports a soda can across the yard who goes "oh wow, what did I just do?" (that's almost word for word). I mean, really. Surprise, yes, a little of the woah factor, yes, but this sort of thing happens all throughout the story. Sometimes happens and the boy goes "gee golly wow" rather than doing what most kids would do: freak out a little.
The story and pace also fall short. Things occur within the story too suddenly or when they occur we never hear from them again. At one point Noah actually teleports a soda can, which is presented like a big surprise. The problem is that he never does it again. That's it. He teleports once. Noah is also supposed to be the "engineer" of sorts, and miraculously this C- science student suddenly starts building bridges through time when he's barely old enough to even know the basic rules of physics. We're supposed to believe it is from the alien artifacts, but because there is no gradual change in the character it just seems stupid. Really? He suddenly becomes a genius overnight? Uh huh. And I'm a popcorn monster. What else? The pacing moves so slow that we spend most of the movie seeing little of anything happen at all. Rather than trying to pull all the juicy bits to the front of the movie to keep people interested, the movie instead forces us to watch these two kids being nothing more than kids, even though we KNOW that there is something much bigger going on. The film makers should have pulled more of the magical intrigue to the forefront to really drive people to being interested, but instead we're left with a movie that doesn't go anyway for a long while, and then tries to get us interested in what does happen at the tail end, even though we don't really care anymore.

Visuals 4/5
The graphics are probably the high point of the whole film. They intentionally try not to be too ridiculous, which a lot of SF and films for kids tends to do. Instead there is a focus on some sense of realism, which is great. The spinning rocks look like spinning rocks. That's pretty much all I can say here.

Overall 2.25/5
I could go on about what is wrong with this film. Many of the critical reviews of this remarked that what could have been an enchanting, engaging film fell flat because the film makers tried too hard to make it enchanting and engaging and ended up make it a film that couldn't unfold naturally. I would agree. The problems stem from poorly developing the story, not giving characters that have some importance a little more time to make us care, among a whole slew of issues. Pretty graphics aren't enough to save this film from its flaws. If it bored me, someone who gets great joy from all these fun magical kid films (like Harry Potter, Spiderwick, etc.), it has a high likelihood of boring children.

Related Posts by Categories

Widget by Hoctro | Jack Book


  1. Anonymous2:56 PM

    Dakota isn't a professional? For real? Even though she's already made morney than you ever will in your lifetime, and is set to make that many times over in the future?

    Thanks for enlightening the rest of us.


  2. I never said anything about whether she made money or whether she was good. She's a CHILD, and by the laws of this country she can't hold a real job. She's not a professional actor. She's just a child who happens to act. When she is an adult she can make the move to professional actor. Money has nothing to do with it. Is someone who wins the lotto a professional lotto player? If I get a big inheritances does that make me a professional of any sort? No, it doesn't. Someone who is a professional does something for a living legally. Children are allowed to act, but they do not have full control of their money, not like an adult, and for good reason.
    Making money doesn't make you a professional. That's just a silly argument. And there's no guarantee that she'll do anything in the future. Most child actors never cease being child actors. They find it hard to break out of that mold. Dakota is good. She is definitely one of the better of the child actors of our day and she has a shot to become an adult actor and a professional actor, but right now she's just a child. She still has to go to school and do the same things we all had to do before we were 18. Until she becomes an adult she will only be a child actor.

  3. FYI, the movie was actually based on a short fiction piece written by Henry Kuttner and C. L. Moore back in the 1940s called Mimsy Were the Borogoves. I found the story very thought-provoking :)

  4. Gah, well at one point I called it a short story, but I remember them releasing it in book format when the movie came out. In any case, the movie should have no bearing on how good the fiction is. I imagine the story is much better.